Groundwater Pollution Case Study

  • Abbasi SA, Soni R (1984) Teratogenic effects of chromium (VI) in the environment as evidenced by the impact of larvae of amphibian Rand tigrina: implications in the environmental management of chromium. Int J Environ Stud 23:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Abdi H (2003) Partial least squares (PLS) regression. In: Lewis-Beck M et al (eds) Encyclopedia of social sciences research methods. Sage, pp 792–795Google Scholar

  • Alberto WD, Pilar DMD, Valeria AM, Fabiana PS, Cecilia HA, Angeles BMDL (2001) Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study, Suquia river basin (Cordoba-Argentina). Water Res 35(12):2881–2894CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • ATSDR (2000) Toxicological profile for manganese. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, AtlantaGoogle Scholar

  • Bartlett RJ, James BR (1979) Behavior of chromium in soils: III. Oxidation. J Environ Qual 8(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhupinder S (2011) Assessment of groundwater quality with respect to fluoride. Univers J Environ Res Technol 1:45–50Google Scholar

  • Bianchi V, Zantedeschi A, Montaldi A, Majone F (1984) Trivalent chromium is neither cytotoxic nor mutagenic in permeabilized hamster fibroblasts. Toxicol Lett 23:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Carroll SP, Dawes LA, Hargreaves M, Goonetilleke A (2009) Faecal pollution source identification in an urbanizing catchment using antibiotic resistance profiling, discriminant analysis and partial least squares regression. Water Res 43(5):1237–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung YH, Wong MH (1983) Utilisation of animal manures and sewage sludges for growing vegetables. Agric Wastes 5:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chitsazan M, Faryabi M, Zarrasvandi AR (2014) Evaluation of river–aquifer interaction in the north part of Dezful–Andimeshk district, SW of Iran. Arab J Geosci 8:7177–7189Google Scholar

  • Dwivedi SL, Pathak V (2007) A preliminary assignment of water quality index to Mandakini River, Chitrakoot. Indian J Environ Prot 27:1036–1038Google Scholar

  • Eary LE, Rai D (1987) Kinetics of chromium (III) oxidation to chromium (VI) by reaction with manganese dioxides. Environ Sci Technol 21(12):1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Faulkner GL (1973) Geohydrology of the Cross-Florida Barge Canal with special reference to the Ocala vicinity. US Geol Surv Water-Resour Investig 1–73:117Google Scholar

  • Frank LE, Friedman JH (1993) A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools. Technometrics 35:109–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Georgopoulos PG, Roy A, Yonone-Lioy MJ, Opiekun RE, Lioy PJ (2001) Environmental copper, its dynamics and human exposure issues. J Toxicol Environ Health B 4:341–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hakimi F, Ahmadi-khalaji A, Dolatsha T, Mollaei H, Shahrokhi V (2010) Investigation of geology condition and hydrogeology Kuhdasht area, Lorestan province, Iran. In: The 1 st International Applied Geological Congress, Department of Geology, Islamic Azad University, Mashad Branch, IranGoogle Scholar

  • Harilal CC, Hashim A, Arun PR, Baji SJ (2004) Hydrogeochemistry of two rivers of Kerala with special reference to drinking water quality. J Ecol Environ Conserv 10(2):187–192Google Scholar

  • Herczeg A (2001) Can major ion chemistry be used estimate groundwater residence time in basaltic aquifer. In: Cidu R (ed) Proceedings of the 9th international symposium water–rock interaction. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 529–532Google Scholar

  • Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37(3):300–306Google Scholar

  • Howe P, Malcolm H, Dobson S (2004) Manganese and its compounds: environmental aspects. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 63Google Scholar

  • Jacobs J, Foreman TL (2001) Hexavalent chromium, Report by Groundwater Resources Association of California (GRA)Google Scholar

  • Jalali M (2009) Geochemistry characterization of groundwater in an agricultural area of Razan, Hamadan, Iran. Environ Geol 56:1479–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim JO, Mueller CW (1987) Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues, Sage University Paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no 07–014. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar

  • Kovoor GM, Nandagiri L (2007) Developing regression models for predicting pan evaporation from climatic data—a comparison of multiple least-squares, principal components, and partial least-squares approaches. J Irrig Drain E-SCE 133(5):444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Li YX, Li W, Wu J, Xu LC, Su QH, Xiong X (2007) Contribution of additives Cu to its accumulation in pig feces: study in Beijing and Fuxin of China. J Environ Sci-China 19:610–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahvi AH, Nouri J, Babaei AA, Nabizadeh R (2005) Agricultural activities impact on groundwater nitrate pollution. I J Environ Sci Technol 2:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Martens H, Næs T (1989) Multivariate calibration. wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

  • Nadaska G, Lesny J, Michalik I (2012) Environmental aspect of manganese chemistry. Accessed 22 July 2014

  • Nosrati K, Eeckhaut MVD (2012) Assessment of groundwater quality using multivariate statistical techniques in Hashtgerd Plain, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 65:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Nouri J, Mahvi AH, Babaei AA, Jahed GR, Ahmadpour E (2006) Investigations of heavy metals in groundwater. Pak J Biol Sci 9(3):377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Oelschlager W (1971) Fluoride uptake in soil and its depletion. Fluoride 4(2):80–84Google Scholar

  • One BL (1988) Genetic approaches in the study of chromium toxicity and resistance in yeast and bacteria. In: Nriagu JO, Nieboer E (eds) Chromium in the natural and human environments, vol 20. Wiley, New York, pp 351–368Google Scholar

  • Palmer CD, Puls RW (1994) Natural attenuation of hexavalent chromium in groundwater and soils. EPA report number 154015-941505Google Scholar

  • Patel S, Desai KK (2006) Studies on water quality index of some villages of Surat District. Pollut Res 25:281–285Google Scholar

  • Rao NS (2011) High-fluoride groundwater. Environ Monit Assess 176:637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Rao NVR, Suryaprakasa Rao K, Schuiling RD (1993) Fluorine distribution in waters of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 21:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Raudys SJ, Jain AK (1991) Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners. IEEE T Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13:252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Roger M (1982) Ground water and the rural homeowner. U.S. Geological Survey, PamphletGoogle Scholar

  • Sacks LA (1996) Geochemical and isotopic composition of ground water with emphasis on sources of sulfate in the upper Floridan Aquifer in parts of Marion, Sumter, and Citrus Counties, Florida, U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 95–4251, p 47Google Scholar

  • Saxena VK, Ahmed S (2001) Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water–rock interaction study. Environ Geol 40:1084–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Shivshankar S, Pawar RS, Panaskar DB (2012) Comparative study of groundwater from basaltic and granitic aquifers of Dharmabad Taluka of Nanded District, Maharashtra. Adv Appl Sci Res 3(4):2005–2014Google Scholar

  • Singh KP, Malik A, Singh VK, Mohan D, Sinha S (2005) Chemometric analysis of groundwater quality data of alluvial aquifer of Gangetic plain, North India. Anal Chim Acta 550:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Singh KP, Basant N, Gupta S (2011) Support vector machines in water quality management. Anal Chim Acta 703:152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Sujatha D, Reddy BR (2003) Quality characterization of groundwater in the south-eastern part of the Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 44:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Tiwari TN, Das SC, Bose PK (1986) Water Quality Index for the river Jhelum in Kashmir and its seasonal variations. Poll Res 5:1–5Google Scholar

  • Tizro AT, Voudouris KS (2008) Groundwater quality in the semi-arid region of the Chahardouly basin, West Iran. Hydrol Process 22:3066–3078CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (1999) Global Environment Outlook 2000. Earthscan, UKGoogle Scholar

  • Van Weerelt M, Pfeiffer WC, Fiszman M (1984) Uptake and release of 5′Cr (Vl) and 51 Cr (III) by Barnacles. (Balanus sp). Mar Environ Res 11:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (2010) Handbook of partial least squares, concepts, methods and applications. Springer Handbooks of computational statistics, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p 791Google Scholar

  • Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H (2001) Some recent developments in PLS modelling. Chem Intell Lab Syst 58:131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Wu EMY, Kuo SL (2012) Applying a multivariate statistical analysis model to evaluate the water quality of a watershed. Water Environ Res 84(12):2075–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Xiong X, Yanxia L, Wei L, Chunye L, Wei H, Ming Y (2010) Copper content in animal manures and potential risk of soil copper pollution with animal manure use in agriculture. Resour Conserv Recy 54:985–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang H, Wang G, Yang Y, Xue B, Wu B (2014) Assessment of the impacts of land use changes on nonpoint source pollution inputs upstream of the three Gorges Reservoir. Sci World J 1–15. doi:10.1155/2014/526240

  • Zangeneh M, Derikvand E, Zangeneh M (2014) Qualitative zoning of groundwater using GIS (chemical parameter of electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids), a case study: Sabili Plain. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 3(2):194–199Google Scholar

  • Zhou F, Guo H, Liu Y, Jiang Y (2007) Chemometrics data analysis of marine water quality and source identification in Southern Hong Kong. Mar Pollut Bull 54:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Zilberbran M, Rosenthal E, Shachnai E (2001) Impact of urbanization on hydro-chemical evolution of groundwater and on unsaturated zone gas composition in the coastal city of Tel Aviv, Israel. J Contam Hydrol 50:175–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar



    Florida has 13 million residents and is the fourth most populous state (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1991). Like several other sunbelt states, Florida's population is growing steadily, at about 1,000 persons per day, and is estimated to reach 17 million by the year 2000. Tourism is the biggest industry in Florida, attracting nearly 40 million visitors each year. Ground water is the source of drinking water for about 95 percent of Florida's population; total withdrawals amount to about 1.5 billion gallons per day. An additional 3 billion gallons of ground water per day are pumped to meet the needs of agriculture—a $5 billion per year industry, second only to tourism in the state. Of the 50 states, Florida ranks eighth in withdrawal of fresh ground water for all purposes, second for public supply, first for rural domestic and livestock use, third for industrial/commercial use, and ninth for irrigation withdrawals.

    Most areas in Florida have abundant ground water of good quality, but the major aquifers are vulnerable to contamination from a variety of land use activities. Overpumping of ground water to meet the growing demands of the urban centers, which accounts for about 80 percent of the state's population, contributes to salt water intrusion in coastal areas. This overpumping is considered the most significant problem for degradation of ground water quality in the state. Other major sources of ground water contaminants include: (1) pesticides and fertilizers (about 2 million tons/year) used in agriculture, (2) about 2 million on-site septic tanks, (3) more than 20,000 recharge wells used for disposing of stormwater, treated domestic wastewater, and cooling water, (4) nearly 6,000 surface impoundments, averaging one per 30 square kilometers, and (5) phosphate mining activities that are estimated to disturb about 3,000 hectares each year.

    The Hydrogeologic Setting

    The entire state is in the Coastal Plain physiographic province, which has generally low relief. Much of the state is underlain by the Floridan aquifer system, largely a limestone and dolomite aquifer that is found in both confined and unconfined conditions. The Floridan is overlain through most of the state by an intermediate aquifer system, consisting of predominantly clays and sands, and a surficial aquifer system, consisting of predominantly sands, limestone, and dolomite. The Floridan is one of the most productive aquifers in the world and is the most important source of drinking water for Florida residents. The Biscayne, an unconfined, shallow, limestone aquifer located in southeast Florida, is the most intensively used

    0 thoughts on “Groundwater Pollution Case Study

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *